Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 10:26

Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Robin Thicke marries April Love Geary in romantic wedding after nearly 7-year engagement - Page Six
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
What's the difference between a zero shot, a few shot, and a chain of thought prompting?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
How Fast Are You Aging? Neuroscience Says These 3 Simple Tests Can Tell You - Inc.com
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Thank you.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Scientists Spot Mysterious Object in Our Galaxy Pulsing Every 44 Minutes - futurism.com
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
What are the different types of networking?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
What’s next?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.